TAKEAWAYS

• Kasuku questions musicians’ contribution to Uganda’s GDP and calls for measurable economic output
• He argues agriculture has clearer economic value compared to the music industry
• He criticizes declining music quality, citing Madoxx Ssematimba and Joanita Kawalya as examples of lasting artistry

Media personality Kasuku has sparked fresh debate after questioning the extent to which musicians contribute to Uganda’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), arguing that they should not demand preferential treatment or subsidies without clear, direct economic output.

According to Kasuku, sectors like agriculture, particularly coffee production, offer measurable and direct contributions to the economy, unlike the music industry, which he believes often relies on indirect impact claims.

“I don’t entertain this talk of musicians saying they contribute to GDP indirectly. Other sectors like coffee production have clear and direct output that can be measured,” he said.

He further criticized what he described as a decline in professionalism and investment in modern music production, arguing that many artists no longer dedicate sufficient effort to improving the quality of their work.

Kasuku referenced earlier generations of Ugandan musicians, praising their consistency and lasting impact. He cited artists such as Madoxx Ssematimba and Afrigo Band’s Joanita Kawalya, noting that their music remains relevant due to its high production quality.

“Listen to songs from years ago; they still sound better than much of what is being produced today. If musicians want to earn more, they must first invest in quality,” he added.

He concluded by stating that without measurable economic contribution or consistent taxation impact, it becomes difficult to justify government subsidies for the creative industry.

Kasuku’s remarks have since ignited conversation across social media with many agreeing that musicians shouldn’t be getting preferential treatment at the expense of other Ugandans.